Member Log In
Our Challenge

As Stewart Brand said in the introduction to the Whole Earth Catalogs,

"If we are going to act like gods, we might as well get good at it."

And Biomimicry is one key, and in a sense, one of the legacy's of the Whole Earth movement. Like Buckminster Fuller's comprehensive antipatory design science, Biomimicry is (1) the exploration and understanding of nature, i.e., the environment, as the technology and economy of an exquisitely evolved and designed regenerative life support system (living machine) that has been tested and developed over 4.8 billion years of evolution, and then (2) applying those battle-hardened principles to all aspects of human activity--designing, creating, and managing of society, from industrial products, to urban and regional systems, to public policy, business, the economy, etc.

Key Questions

Sustainability 2030's (S2030) research/practice program addresses the following key questions:

1. How can you/we become effective, powerful, even transformational forces for sustainability?

2. What is the program required for ultimate sustainability success--the end game?

3. Who has part of the answer now (current sustainability champions), how far do they take us, and how can we harness the state-of-the-art leading edge sustainability to an innovative research/practice program that gets us to ultimate success in the limited time remaining?  (more)

Mission

Advance, accelerate, and amplify an accurate understanding of the sustainability challenge and how to harness the power and potential of sustainability for an effective response before time runs out. The Strategic Sustainability2030 Institute  (S2030I) is a web-based think/do tank (more).

Affiliations
International Society of Sustainability Professionals
Announcements

UPCOMING:

April 2013, Chicago, APA National Conference.

May 13-15, 2013, Seattle, Living Future unConference.

PAST (2012):

October 23-26, Portland, EcoDistrict Summit 2012.

July 31-Aug. 4, Portland, Ecosystem Services Conference.

May 2-4, Portland, The Living Future Unconference for deep green professionals.

June 15-18, Brazil, Rio+20 United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development

Web Engine-Host
Powered by Squarespace
Search The Site
Our Challenge

as Buckminster Fuller observed, is

"to make the world work for 100% of humanity, in the shortest possible time, through spontaneous cooperation without ecological offense or the disadvantage of anyone."

This goal is the essence of sustainable development! The Buckminster Fuller Institute (BFI) provides access to Bucky's legacy, including his comprehensive anticipatory design science revolution. Check out their website, their programs, and engage.

Problem & Way Out

  

Caption: "Sadly, the only proven way to achieve global GHG reductions so far has been economic recession." Comment: Fortunately, shifting to 100% renewables would catalyze the global transition to durable prosperity and community well-being in a way that would eliminate GHG production AND grow the economy <<continued>>. (See also: strategic sustainabilitynatural capitalismits four strategies, and RMI's Reinventing Fire [energy] Program.) 

APA Links
FEATURES1

Green Urbanism - Formulating a series of holistic principles

Green Growth - Recent Developments (OECD)

Foundation Earth - Rethinking Society from the Ground Up

Reinventing Fire - A key transformational initiative of RMI worth knowing/watching.

A Quick-Start Guide to Strategic Sustainability Planning

NEW Report: Embedding sustainability into government culture.

New STARS LEED-like sustainable transportation tool for plans, projects, cities, corridors, regions.

Strategic Community Sustainability Planning workshop resources.

Leveraging Leading-Edge Sustainability report.

Winning or losing the future is our choice NOW!

How Possible is Sustainable Development, by Edward Jepson, PhD.

Legacy sustainability articles -- the Naphtali Knox collection.

FEATURES2

TNS Transition to Global Sustainability Network

EcoDistricts -- NextGen Urban Sustainability

Darin Dinsmore: Community & Regional Sustainability Strategies and Planning

Sustainable Infrastructure: The Guide to Green Engineering and Design

APA-SCP (Sustainable Community Planning) Interest Group

Sustainability Learning Center

New path breaking Solutions Journal

Institute for Governance & Sustainable Development

Strategic Sustainability -- distance learning at BHT

Q4 Consulting - Mindfulness, Sustainability, and Leadership

RealClimate--Climate Science by Real Scientists

World Cafe--Designed Conversation for Group Intelligence

Real Change--Research Program for Global Sustainability Decision Making

RMI Conference, SF, 10-1/3-2009

Real Time Carbon Counter

Global Climate Change - Implications for US

Agenda for a Sustainable America 2009

ALIA Institute Sustainability Leadership

Frontiers in Ecological Economics

Herman Daly -- Failed Growth to Sustainable Steady State?

EOF - Macroeconomics and Ecological Sustainability

Gil Friend - Truth About Green Business

Sustainable Transpo SF

Google Earth-Day KMLs

AIA Sustainability 2030 Toolkit

Donella Meadows - Which Future?

Urban Mobility System wins Bucky Challenge 2009

Renewable Economy Cheaper than Systems Collapse

Population Growth-Earth Forum

Breakthrough Ideas-Bucky Challenge

Urban & Regional Planning-Cities at a Turning Point

John P. Holdren-Meeting the Climate Change Challenge

Stephen Cohen's Weekly Column in the New York Observer

CSP CERTIFICATION INITIATIVE

Saturday
Sep102011

Community Sustainability Planning Certification and International Organization?

Good or bad idea?

A colleague and I are developing a distance learning course in community sustainability planning.

As it evolved, it seemed like it would be more valuable if the course were embedded within an international membership organization to advance an emerging common understanding and range of practices and include a certification program. Such an organization might be named the International Association of Sustainable Community Planning (IASCP).

We would be interested in comments feedback. Go here http://www.whistlegreen.com/iascp/ to view a mock up web site concept proposal (comment at the site, here, or both), and/or read the following for more detail.

Part of me reacts to this idea in the positive: yes, good idea, needed, useful. Part of me reacts in the negative: just what we need, another sustainability organization pitching its particular approach and certification. There must be tens if not hundreds of other organizations out there already. Why do we need another one?

I don’t think there is much chance of success as just another organization. However, if the IASCP could function as an integrative, umbrella group for the field, with a course/base certification that provided an integrative foundation and mastery of common components, concepts, skills, and then incorporated the particular frameworks, approaches, and trainings of other existing orgs, the umbrella/certification function might advance the understanding and practice in this young arena of evolving concepts, tools, and practices. The training and certification of existing programs would be arranged thru reciprocal credit for certification maintenance or advanced/specialty certifications within the IASCP. There would be no anticipated changes in other organizations other than a reciprocal credit agreement with the IASCP when a person successfully completed the other organization’s training/certification. Part of the research and development work of the IACSP could include integrative projects with other interested organizations to further integration and synthesis of understanding and practice.

To test the idea and solicit some feedback, my colleague has developed a mock-up website to present the concept proposal in more detail and to solicit feedback. Go here, http://www.whistlegreen.com/iascp/, and quickly click thru the few pages and let us know what you think. In particular,

  1. How does the concept strike you initially and upon reflection?
  2. Assuming it gathered momentum and did the job, is this a good idea/bad idea? Why?
  3. What types of fatal or resolvable issues, start-up, production, use, or otherwise, do you foresee?
  4. Any other comments/reactions?

If you have the time and interest, we would love to hear your reactions and thoughts. For those who do comment, thank you in advance.